Stablecoins have emerged as one of the most transformative innovations in the cryptocurrency space, bridging the gap between the volatility of traditional cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and the stability demanded by mainstream financial systems. This rise has brought with it a wave of innovation, and nowhere is this more apparent than in the growing number of patent applications for stablecoin technologies.

From algorithmic stabilization techniques to cross-border payment systems, the innovations behind these patent applications pave the way for a more stable crypto-economy. But what do these patent filings tell us about the future of stablecoin adoption? Are they merely defensive strategies by crypto traders and institutions, or do they hint at broader shift toward stablecoin integration into mainstream financial systems?

Background on Stablecoins

By way of background, stablecoins are cryptocurrencies designed to maintain a stable value, typically by pegging their price to a reserve asset such as fiat currency (e.g., the U.S. dollar), a commodity (e.g., gold), or even a basket of assets (e.g., using algorithms and smart contracts to regulate supply and stabilize value without collateral). Unlike traditional cryptocurrencies, which are prone to price volatility, stablecoins aim to combine the benefits of blockchain technology—such as transparency and decentralization—with price stability. Stablecoins have become a focal point for both financial and technological advancement, driving an increase in stablecoin patent applications since their inception in 2014.

The Growth of Stablecoin-Related Innovations

The adoption of stablecoins has sparked significant innovation, as reflected in the growing number of blockchain patent applications filed worldwide, with the majority being filed in the U.S. and China. Companies and financial institutions are increasingly vying to protect their proprietary technologies in this competitive space.

Although there were early pioneers in the stablecoin space as early as 2014, stablecoins gained widespread traction in subsequent years, particularly with the introduction of the widely popular Ethereum-based stablecoins like DAI in 2017. Between 2017 to 2020, the number of blockchain and stablecoin related patent applications surged, including innovations covering algorithmic stability mechanisms, smart contract frameworks, and regulatory compliance systems. Blockchain-related patent applications, including those specific to stablecoins, peaked in 2020.

Challenges and Recovery in Stablecoin Innovation

Between 2021 to 2022, cryptocurrencies struggled to compete with inflation, leading to the devaluation and collapse of several cryptocurrencies and stablecoins. While these downward pressures impacted innovation in stablecoin technologies, stablecoin-related intellectual property saw a resurgence in 2024 with an increase in blockchain and stablecoin related patent applications. Despite fluctuations, overall blockchain and stablecoin patent activity remains robust as interest in stablecoins and cryptocurrencies remains strong.

For example, earlier this month, Ripple, the creator of open source blockchain XRP, announced its plans to launch a stablecoin following its receipt of regulatory approval. This announcement resulted in an 11% surge in XRP’s value within 24 hours of the disclosure. This upward trend in stablecoins reflects the maturation and evolution of the cryptocurrency industry, signaling a shift toward wider institutional acceptance and broader utility.

The interest in stablecoin-related patents signals several key trends in the evolution of cryptocurrency:

  • Institutionalization of Cryptocurrency – Increasing involvement of financial institutions and regulatory oversight.
  • Regulatory Focus and Compliance – Emphasis on compliance to meet global regulatory standards.
  • Decentralized Finance and Innovation – Expansion of decentralized financial applications powered by stablecoins.
  • Global Adoption and Competition – A race among nations and corporations to lead in stablecoin technology and integration.

The Role of Stablecoins in the Future of Finance

The growth of stablecoin-related patent applications and intellectual property is a cornerstone of the evolving cryptocurrency landscape. Stablecoins have the potential to play a vital role in bridging traditional and digital finance, thereby enabling faster, more efficient transactions while adhering to the demands of regulators and consumers alike.

For businesses and innovators, this presents a dual opportunity: capitalize on the growing demand for stablecoins and protect innovations through strategic patent filings. As the cryptocurrency ecosystem continues to mature, stablecoins are poised to be at the forefront of this transformation, driving new opportunities for innovation and adoption.

Proskauer’s multi-disciplinary intellectual property group has been advising innovators and companies in the field of this technology ensuring maximum value for our clients’ intellectual property.

Posted in Federal Rules, Intellectual Property
Tags: bitcoin, Cryptocurrency, decentralized finance, Intellectual Property, patent, patent applications, patent law, Regulatory and Compliance, Stablecoin, Stablecoin Innovation
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Baldassare Vinti Baldassare Vinti

Baldassare (“Baldo”) Vinti is the head of Proskauer’s Intellectual Property Litigation Group.

Baldo is a first-chair trial lawyer known for navigating complex, bet-the-company intellectual property disputes across industry verticals and next-generation technologies. With over 25 years of experience, Baldo represents leading global companies…

Baldassare (“Baldo”) Vinti is the head of Proskauer’s Intellectual Property Litigation Group.

Baldo is a first-chair trial lawyer known for navigating complex, bet-the-company intellectual property disputes across industry verticals and next-generation technologies. With over 25 years of experience, Baldo represents leading global companies and universities in patent, trade secret, false advertising, consumer class actions and technology-related breach of contract litigation in federal and state courts as well as before the International Trade Commission.

Baldo is particularly sought after for his courtroom skill and strategic depth, having led trials, arbitrations and appeals in high-stakes disputes involving technologies ranging from pharmaceuticals and medical devices to encryption, digital media, diagnostics, mobile platforms and software. Baldo has represented global corporations, including Arkema S.A., British Telecommunications PLC, Church & Dwight Co., Inc., Henry Schein, Inc., Maidenform Brands Inc., Mitsubishi Electric Corp., Ossur North America Inc., Panasonic Corp., Sony Corp., Welch Foods, Inc. and Zenith Electronics LLC.

With a background in pharmacy, Baldo brings deep domain expertise to pharmaceutical litigation. He has a proven record of driving successful outcomes in complex pharmaceutical milestone payment, royalty and licensing disputes—often stemming from collaboration agreements, co-development deals, and M&A transactions—where the financial and strategic stakes run high.

In addition to representing corporate clients, Baldo works closely with university innovation and technology transfer offices to maximize the financial return of research investments. He develops tailored IP asset optimization strategies and aggressively enforces intellectual property rights to protect and monetize core innovations—whether through high-value licensing agreements, shaping and advancing spin-out company development, or successful litigation.

Baldo also provides strategic counsel on IP due diligence, complex licensing, IP structuring, patentability and freedom-to-operate analyses, and infringement and validity opinions. He advises boards and executive teams on aligning IP strategy with business objectives, mitigating risk and maximizing the value of innovation assets.

A frequent author and commentator on intellectual property topics, Baldo has been quoted in the National Law Journal, Bloomberg BNA, Law360, Westlaw Journal and Inside Counsel magazine. He is also a regular contributor to articles published in Medical Product Outsourcing magazine that deal with the medical device industry.

Baldo served as a judicial intern for Hon. John E. Sprizzo of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and for Hon. Charles A. LaTorella of the New York Supreme Court.

Read more about Baldassare Vinti
Show more Show less
Photo of Margaret Ukwu Margaret Ukwu

Margaret Ukwu is an associate in the Litigation Department and a member of the Intellectual Property and Mass Torts & Product Liability Groups. She focuses her practice on complex patent litigation involving a broad range of technologies, including pharmaceutical and medical devices, electrical…

Margaret Ukwu is an associate in the Litigation Department and a member of the Intellectual Property and Mass Torts & Product Liability Groups. She focuses her practice on complex patent litigation involving a broad range of technologies, including pharmaceutical and medical devices, electrical arts pertaining to mechanical systems, computer architecture, internet applications, mobile operating systems, wireless communications and user interfaces. She also advises clients on all aspects of patentability and provides patent counseling regarding invalidity, non-infringement and freedom to operate assessments.

Margaret also specializes in all aspects of pre-trial work and trial preparation, including drafting motions in limine, jury instructions, working on demonstrative and exhibit lists, preparing witnesses for trial and drafting opening and closing statements.

While in law school, Margaret interned for the Honorable Sam Rugege at the Supreme Court of Rwanda. Prior to practicing law, she worked as a control systems engineer at a large multinational company.

Read more about Margaret Ukwu
Show more Show less
Related Posts
Sonos, Inc. v. Google LLC: CAFC Leaves Expanded Role for Prosecution Laches in Limbo
September 23, 2025
Eyes Open to the Past: Federal Circuit Holds Prosecution History Is Claim Construction Evidence
July 3, 2025
Troubling Trend of “Self” Revocation In the CRISPR Space Continues in Europe
December 17, 2024