In April, we discussed oral arguments at the Supreme Court for Abitron Austria GmbH et al. v. Hetronic International, Inc., a case in which the Supreme Court considered the extraterritorial reach of the Lanham Act (“Act”) for the first time since 1952. Last month, the Court ruled that the Lanham Act only reaches claims of infringement where the infringing use in commerce is domestic.
Isaiah Anderson is an associate in the Litigation Department.
Isaiah Anderson earned his J.D. degree from New York University, where he was a Senior Executive Editor of the New York University Law Review, the Alumni Relations Committee Co-Chair for the Black Allied Law Students Association (BALSA), the Community Chair for the Christian Legal Students Association (CLSA), and a member of the Asian-Pacific American Students Association (APALSA). While at NYU, he worked with the Center on Race, Inequality, and the Law on efforts to advocate for racial and economic justice.
Prior to law school, Isaiah worked as a litigation paralegal at another New York law firm, supporting two commercial litigation trial teams and working on several pro bono cases focused on education and immigration. At Proskauer, Isaiah continues to have an active pro bono practice and leverages his experience and studies in litigation for all his matters.
Last month, the Supreme Court heard oral argument on Abitron Austria GmbH et al. v. Hetronic International, Inc. and considered, for the first time since 1952, the extraterritorial reach of the Lanham Act. This case presents the opportunity for the Court to establish a uniform test for the Lanham Act’s extraterritorial reach when seeking remedies in U.S. courts and to provide clarity for U.S. companies looking to protect their marks and reputation around the world.