Photo of Shiva Pedram

Shiva Pedram is an associate in the Litigation Department.  Her practice focuses on complex civil litigation, with an emphasis on antitrust and product liability actions.  Shiva has represented clients in a variety of industries in both federal and state courts, and in investigations by the SEC and DOJ.  She has experience in many stages of litigation, including coordinating discovery, drafting pleadings, briefing dispositive motions, and preparing witnesses for depositions and trial. Recently, Shiva was part of the team that secured a landmark victory for Sanderson Farms in one of the largest-ever antitrust trials in the agricultural industry, defeating $7 billion in damages claims. 

Shiva maintains an active pro bono practice, recently securing a favorable settlement with the federal government on behalf of a family who was wrongfully separated at the U.S. border. 

Shiva earned her J.D. from Harvard Law School, where she served on the National Security Journal and Middle Eastern Law Students Association.  While at Harvard, Shiva represented clients in the Harvard Family and Domestic Violence Clinic and Immigration Clinic. She also worked as a legal intern at the County of San Diego Office of the Primary Public Defender.

Shiva has a B.A. in political science from U.C. Berkeley, where she graduated with Highest Distinction in General Scholarship.

The Eleventh Circuit upheld an arbitral award last month despite the arbitrators’ failure to make certain disclosures regarding potential sources of bias. The litigation involved a dispute between the Panama Canal Authority, the government agency responsible for the operation and management of the Panama Canal, and Grupo Unidos por el Canal, S.A., the contractor hired to construct the Panama Canal expansion. Complications with the project caused progress to be “severely delayed and disrupted,” resulting in liability disputes between the parties. 

Kim Kardashian has been hit with a lawsuit by New York-based Beauty Concepts LLC over Kardashian’s recently launched skincare line, “SKKN by Kim.”  Beauty Concepts filed a complaint in the Eastern District of New York against Kardashian, her business entity Kimsaprincess Inc., and beauty company Coty Inc. on Tuesday, alleging that SKKN by Kim uses branding “highly confusingly similar” to Beauty Concepts’ own skincare line, “SKKN+”.  The complaint further alleges that Beauty Concepts has priority of use over the letters “skkn” due to the company’s consistent use of the mark “SKKN+” since at least August 2018.

On April 21, 2021, the Second Appellate District of the Court of Appeal of the State of California filed an unpublished opinion rejecting Uber’s attempt to enforce an arbitration provision that waived an employee’s right to bring a claim under the California Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). This statute authorizes “aggrieved employees” to file lawsuits to recover civil penalties from employers for violations of the California labor code.